USCFC General Jurisdiction-Reported

REPORTED OPINION. ECF No. is reissued with redactions. Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (jm) Service on parties made.

REPORTED OPINION granting MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability filed by SARAH E. PRICE, and denying [18] CROSS MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by USA. Joint Status Report due by 11/12/2021. Signed by Judge Ryan T. Holte. (ehb) Service on parties made.

Keywords: re: Reported Opinion and Order. Motion for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; Rails-to-Trails; Easement; Fee Simple; Issue Preclusion; Deed Construction; Georgia Property Law; Centerline Presumption; Warranty Clause; Reservation of Cultivation Rights; Strips-and-Gores-Doctrine.

REPORTED OPINION. Reissued public opinion of the Court's September 30, 2021, sealed memorandum opinion denying the defendant's motion to dismiss, granting the defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record, and denying the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made.

REPORTED OPINION granting Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (emc) Service on parties made.

REPORTED OPINION finding as moot Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying [29] Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (pbf) Service on parties made.

REPORTED OPINION AND ORDER, reflecting redactions from the opinion and order previously entered under seal on October 1, 2021. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow.

Keywords: re: [544]: Patent case; "all elements" test for infringement of a patent claim

REPORTED ORDER denying MOTION to Intervene filed by TORRES-SAS SECURITY LLC JOINT VENTURE. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (jb2) Service on parties made.

Keywords: re: Postjudgment Motion for Leave to Intervene; Timeliness; Bid Protest.

REPORTED OPINION and ORDER denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting [38] Defendant's Cross-Motion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (cmc) Service on parties made.

REPORTED OPINION. The claim of Paul G. Nix and Ann M. Mix is dismissed with prejudice as a sanction for Mr. Nix's misconduct. Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, there being no just reason for delay, the Clerk shall enter judgment in defendant's favor with respect to Mr. and Mrs. Nix's claim. The Clerk shall send this decision to Mr. and Mrs. Nix at their mailing address of record. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1) (Main Document 117 replaced on 10/6/2021 to correct a typo at the bottom of page 9.) (dls). Mr. and Mrs. Nix served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Reported Opinion, - Dismissal of Claim as a Sanction for a Plaintiffs Misconduct; Profane, Threatening, and Abusive Communications; Inherent Power

REPORTED OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Marian Blank Horn. (jm5) Service on parties made.

REPORTED ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Motion in Limine. (1) Evidence adduced at trial is limited to those issues previously identified by the Court. (2) E&I's proposed offer of proof is DENIED to the extent that testimony or those exhibits relate to previously dismissed Counts of the Complaint or claims for which summary judgment was granted. (3) The remaining issue relating to disputed documents intended to be offered at trial by E&I is reserved pending a determination at trial of relevance, materiality, and foundation. Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (jm) Service on parties made.

REPORTED OPINION granting Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Thompson M. Dietz. (adb) Service on parties made.

Keywords: re: Implied-in-fact Contract; Mutuality of Intent; Failure to State a Claim; RCFC 12(b)(6).

REPORTED OPINION granting Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1). The clerk's office is directed to ENTER final judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, in favor of defendant, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Opinion on Motion to Dismiss 12(b)(1); Pro Se Complaint; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Tax Refund Claim; Statute of Limitations; 26 U.S.C. § 6532(a)(1). (TQ)

REPORTED OPINION of the court's August 25, 2021 sealed opinion and order ruling on [205] defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's [202] Evidentiary Rulings Order is granted in part, for the limited purpose of finding that pages three through five of Plaintiffs' Exhibit 138 (Issue Number 3) are admitted under FRE 807, not under FRE 803(6); and denied in part, as to all other issues; AND denying [206] plaintiff's Partial Motion for Reconsideration. The final rulings in the court's November 4, 2020 evidentiary rulings order identifying which evidence is admissible and which evidence is excluded remain unchanged, see ECF No. [202] at 29-30. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made.

Keywords: re: Reported Opinion and Order; Motion for Reconsideration; RCFC 59(a); FRE 602; FRE 803(6); FRE 807. (TQ)

REPORTED OPINION of the court's August 25, 2021 sealed opinion and order ruling on [205] defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's [202] Evidentiary Rulings Order is granted in part, for the limited purpose of finding that pages three through five of Plaintiffs' Exhibit 138 (Issue Number 3) are admitted under FRE 807, not under FRE 803(6); and denied in part, as to all other issues; AND denying [206] plaintiff's Partial Motion for Reconsideration. The final rulings in the court's November 4, 2020 evidentiary rulings order identifying which evidence is admissible and which evidence is excluded remain unchanged, see ECF No. [202] at 29-30. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith.

Keywords: re: Reported Opinion and Order; Motion for Reconsideration; RCFC 59(a); FRE 602; FRE 803(6); FRE 807. (TQ)

REPORTED OPINION granting motion to dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow.

Keywords: re: post-award bid protest; Department of Defense pilot program for acquisitions of innovative commercial items, technologies, and services; National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, § 879, 130 Stat. 2312; jurisdiction; standing; evaluation by peer review; exercise of discretion.

REPORTED OPINION denying Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting [11] Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); denying [15] Motion for Default Judgment The Clerk is directed to enter judgment; denying Plaintiff's request to transfer the case to district court. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (dpk) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Order on Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1), Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Reported Opinion, Pro Se; Motion to Appoint Counsel; Motion for Default Judgment; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); Motion to Transfer; 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

REPORTED OPINION granting in part and denying in part Motion for Attorney Fees. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow.

Keywords: re: Attorneys fees; Equal Access to Justice Act; 28 U.S.C. § 2412; prevailing party; some attorneys' hours not reasonably expended.

REPORTED OPINION denying motion for reconsideration. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith because, as alleged, Mr. Amir's claims are clearly beyond the subject matter jurisdiction of this court. The clerk's office shall REJECT any further filings in this case. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (jb2) Service on parties made. plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion for Reconsideration.

REPORTED OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (beg) Service on parties made. Modified on 9/16/2021 to clarify docket text